Women on Microcredit: Experiences of Women Trapped Between the Neoliberal Ethics and Poverty

Authors

  • Semiha Arı
  • Çağla Diner

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33831/jws.v17i2.208

Keywords:

microcredit, neoliberalism, poverty, feminization of poverty, women’s empowerment

Abstract

This study intends to narrate the life conditions of the poor women members of the Turkish Grameen Microfinance Program (TGMP) in Batman along with their experiences with indebtedness and their views on the program. It will also give information on how the women spend the credits they receive with a focus on whether or not the microcredit program of the TGMP enables women to establish small businesses from which they can earn income. The findings of the qualitative research carried out with a small group of women show that we need to question why the microcredit programs are becoming more widespread both in practice and in the development discourse in Turkey as well as all over the globe in the past fifteen years. The expansion of the microfinance sector and the related support that these programs receive from many different states, including Turkey, and international organizations should be regarded as one of the consequences of the fact that today capitalism can only be sustained through financial expansion. The microcredit programs, most of which hold the claim to struggle with poverty, actually fit in very well with the neoliberal governance strategies that embrace the view that states should be rid of most of the responsibilities they used to carry for the welfare of their people. The research that is based on qualitative interviews with women who use microcredit in Batman has given us the opportunity to reflect on how the state has been transforming in the neoliberal era. It has also led us to see what kind of roles and functions are regarded as appropriate for women in this transformation of not only the economy but also the state and its governance strategies. 

References

Adaman F. & Bulut T. (2007). Diyarbakır’dan İstanbul’a 500 Milyonluk Umut Hikayeleri Mikrokredi Maceraları. İstanbul: İletişim.
Buğra, Ayşe (2007) Yoksullukla Mücadele Yöntemi Olarak Mikrokredi: Acıklı Bir Hikâye. Sosyal Politika Forumu Bülteni, 2 (Ocak).
Cockburn A. (2006). The Myth of Microloans. Weekend Edition. Inernet adresi: http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn10202006.html. Erişim tarihi 06.01. 2011.
EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit) (2014). Global Microscope 2014: The Enabling Environment for Financial İnclusion. Sponsored by MIF/IDB, CAF, ACCION and Citi. EIU, New York, NY. Internet adresi: https://centerforfinancialinclusion blog.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/eiu_global_microscope_2014.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 28.7.2015.
Elyachar J. (2002). Empowerment Money: The World Bank, Non-Governmental Organizations, and the Value of Culture in Egypt. Public Culture, 14(3): 493-513.
Ergüneş N. (2011). Kadınlara Yönelik Kredi Biçimleri ve Kadın Emeğinin Enformelleşmesi. İçinde Dedeoğlu S. & Öztürk M.Y.(Der.), Kapitalizm, Ataerkillik ve Kadın Emeği: Türkiye Örneği, İstanbul: Sav.
Harvey D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Isserles R.G. (2003). Microcredit: The Rhetoric of Empowerment, the Reality of Development As Usual. Women's Studies Quarterly, 31(3-4): 38-57.
Karim L. (2008). Demystifying Micro-credit: The Grameen Bank, NGOs, and Neoliberalism in Bangladesh. Cultural Dynamics, 20(1): 5-29.
Lofça İ., Aydın A.H., Güngör S. & Büyükyenigün Ö. (2010). Mikrokredi ve Yoksulluk: Yoksulluğun Olmadığı Bir Dünyaya Doğru. Kahramanmaraş: Kahramanmaraş Valiliği.
Microcredit Summit Campaign. About the Campaign. Internet adresi: http://www.microcreditsummit.org/about-the-campaign2.html. Erişim Tarihi: 18.7.2015.
Moghadam V.M. (2005). The ‘Feminization of Poverty‘ and Women‘s Human Rights. Social and Human Sciences Papers in Women’s Studies/Gender Research, No.2.
Planet Rating Global Microfinance Rating Agency. Turkish Grameen Microcredit Program, Turkey. Internet adresi: http://www.mixmarket.org/sites/default /files/tgmp_sp_r-planet_rating_11.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 31.7.2015.
Rankin K. (2001). Governing Development: Neoliberalism, Microcredit, and Rational Economic Women. Economy and Society, 30(1): 18–37.
Rozas D. (2015). Microfinance in Mexico: Beyond the Brink. 19 June, 2015. European Microfinance Platform. İnternet adresi: http://www.e-mfp.eu/blog /microfinance-mexico-beyond-brink. Erişim Tarihi: 18.7.2015.
Soykan T. (2006). Damla damla kredi yoksulluğu alt etti, Radikal, 8 Mayıs 2006. Internet adresi: http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=1867 07. Erişim tarihi: 31.7.2015.
TGMP (2008). 10,000’inci Üyeye Mikrokredi. Ankara:TGMP.
TGMP (2015). Mikrokredi Turkiye Grameen Mikro Finans Programı, 1 (1). İnternet adresi: http://tgmp.net/admin/pages/files/mikrokredi_bulten_we b.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 30.7.2015.
TGMP Sunum. İnternet adresi: http://www.tgmp.net/tr/. Erişim tarihi: 17.7.2015.
Türkiye İsrafı Önleme Vakfı Mikrokredi Merkezi-TGMP (2012) Yasal Mali Tablolar ve Bağımsız Denetçi Raporu. İnternet adresi: http://www.tgmp.net/ Raporlar /e064d35d-c987-4686-9239-b8cc5ef6ee9a.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 17.7.2015.
Weber H. (2004). The 'New Economy' and Social Risk: Banking on the Poor? Review of International Political Economy, 11(2): 356-386.
Yunus M. (1998). Poverty Alleviation: Is Economics Any Help? Lessons from the Grameen Bank Experience. Journal of International Affairs, 52(1): 48-65.
Yunus M. (2004). Grameen Bank, Microcredit and Millennium Development Goals. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(36): 4077-4080.
Yunus M., Moingeon B. & Lehmann-Ortega L. (2010). Building Social Business Models: Lessons from the Grameen Experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3): 308–325.

Published

2016-12-12

How to Cite

Arı, S., & Diner, Çağla. (2016). Women on Microcredit: Experiences of Women Trapped Between the Neoliberal Ethics and Poverty. Kadın/Woman 2000, Journal for Women’s Studies, 17(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.33831/jws.v17i2.208