The Critique of John Rawls’s Domestic Justice Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33831/jws.v18i1.265Keywords:
family, feminist legal theory, original position, public reasoning, liberalismAbstract
John Rawls, being one of the most important political philosophers of the twentieth century, has influenced most of the theorist of his time, including feminists with his theory of justice. Feminists finding liberal thinkers’ gendered family justice approaches problematic saw a similar problem in Rawls’s theory of justice. In this paper, the feminist critiques towards the concept of family embedded in Rawls’s works will be discussed in chronological order.
References
Benhabib Ş.(1999). Modernizm, Evrensellik ve Birey (Çev: Küçük M.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Berktay F. (2012). Tarihin Cinsiyeti. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
Borovalı M.(2003). John Rawls ve Siyaset Felsefesi. İçinde, İçinde, Rawls J., Halkların Yasası ve Kamusal Akıl Düşüncesinin Yeniden Ele Alınması (Çev: Özbank M.). İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları: ix.
Botting E.H.(2013). Rawls on International Justice. İçinde, Abbey R. (Ed.), Feminist Interpretations of John Rawls. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press: :115-132.
Boucher J.(2003). Male Power and Contract Theory: Hobbes and Locke in Carole Pateman’s The Sexual Contract. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 36(1): 23-38.
Brake E. (2004). Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 1(3): 293-309.
Brennan T.& Pateman C.(1979). Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth: Women and the Origins of Liberalism. Political Studies, 27(2):183-200.
Chambers C. (2013). The Family as a Basic Institution- A Feminist Analysis of the Basic Structure as Subject. İçinde, Abbey R. (Ed.), Feminist Interpretations of John Rawls. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press: 75-95.
Donovan J. (1997). Feminist Teori (Çev: Bora A.; Ağduk Gevrek M. & Sayılan F.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Elshtain J.B.(1993): Public Man Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
English J. (1977). Justice Between Generations. Philosophical Studies, 31(2): 91-104.
Exdell J.(1994). Feminism, Fundamentalism and Liberal Legitimacy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 24(3): 441-463.
Freeman M.D.A (2014). Introduction to Jurisprudence (9th ed.). UK: Sweet and Maxwell.
Lloyd G. (1996). Erkek Akıl (Çev: Özcan M.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Green K.(1986). Rawls, Women and Priority of Liberty. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64:26-36.
Gürgey İ.(2015). Feminist Hukuk Teorisi Nedir? Hukuk Kuramı, 1(5): 28-44.
Hirshman L.R.(1994). Is the Original Position Inherently Male-Superior? Columbia Law Review, 94(6): 1860-1881.
Kearns D. (1983). A Theory of Justice - And Love; Rawls on the Family Politics. Australian Journal of Poltical Science, 18(2): 36-42.
Landes J.(2003). Further Thoughts on the Public/Private Distinction. Journal of Women’s History, 15(2): 28-39.
MacIntryre A.(2001). Erdem Peşinde (Çev: Özcan M.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
MacKinnon C.(2003): Feminist Bir Devlet Kuramına Doğru (Çev: Yöney T.; Yücesoy S.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
McClain L.C.(1991-1992). ‘Atomistic Man’ Revisited: Liberalism, Connection and Feminist Jurisprudence. Southern California Law Review, 65:1173-1264.
Minow M.(1994). Making All The Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Moller Okin S. (2013). Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton University Press.
Nussbaum M.(1998). Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nussbaum M.(2003). Rawls and Feminism. İçinde, Freeman S. (Der.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:488-520.
Nussbaum M.(2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum M(2008). Women and Human Development- The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oğuzman K. & Barlas N.(2013). Medeni Hukuk. İstanbul: Vedat Kitapçılık.
Okin S.M. (1989). Justice, Gender and Family. New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers.
Okin S.M.(1994). Political Liberalism, Justice and Gender. Ethics, 105(1):23-43.
Okin S.M. (2004). Justice and Gender: An Unfinished Debate. Fordham Law Review, 72: 1537-1567.
Okin S.M. (2005). ‘Forty Acres and A Mule’ for Women: Rawls and Feminism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 4(2): 233-248.
Pateman C.(1988). Sexaul Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pateman C.(1989). The Disorderof Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pateman C.(2004). Kardeşler Arası Toplumsal Sözleşme (Çev: Bora A.). İçinde, Keane J. (Der.), Toplum ve Devlet ve Sivi. Ankara: Yedi Kıta Yayınları: 119-146.
Poole R. (1993): Ahlak ve Modernlik (Çev: Küçük M.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Rawls J. (1997). The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3): 765-807.
Rawls J. (1999). The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. İçinde, Freeman S. (Der.), John Rawls: Collected Papers. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press: 573-615.
Rawls (1999). Fairness to Goodness. İçinde, Freeman S. (Der.), John Rawls: Collected Papers. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press267-285.
Rawls J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. USA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls J. (2001). Justice As Fairness-A Restatement (Ed. Kelly E.). Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rawls J. (2003). Kamusal Akıl Düşüncesinin Yeniden Ele Alınması. İçinde, Rawls J., Halkların Yasası ve Kamusal Akıl Düşüncesinin Yeniden Ele Alınması (Çev: Özbank M.). İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları: 143-194.
Rawls J.(2006): Siyasal Liberalizm (Çev: Bilgin M.F.). İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayını.
Sam N.(2008). Yoksulluğa Bir Yaklaşım Biçimi: Kapasite Yaklaşımı. Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27: 59-70.
Sandel M.(1994). Şekli Cumhuriyet ve Engellenmemiş Benlik. Mürekkep, 1:14-20.
Sandel M. (2014). Liberalizm ve Adaletin Sınırları (Çev: Zeybekoğlu A.E.). Ankara: Dost Kitapevi Yayınları.
Scales A. (1980-1981). Towards a Feminist Jurisprudence. Indiana Law Journal, 56(3): 375-444.
Schneider E. (1993). The Dialectic of Rights and Politics: Perspectives from the Women’s Movement. İçinde , Kelly D. (Ed.), Feminist Legal Theory-Foundations. Weisberg, Philadelphia: Temple University Press:507-528.
Schneider E. (2000). Battered Women and Feminist Lawmaking. New Haven&London: Yale University Press.
Schwartzman L.H.(2013). Feminism, Method and Rawlsian Abstraction. İçinde, Abbey R. (Ed.), Feminist Interpretations of John Rawls. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press: 40-56.
Sen A. (2004): Özgürlükle Kalkınma (Çev: Alogan Y.). İstanbul, Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Taylor C. (1985): Philosophy and Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers (Cilt II). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weisberg K. (Der.)(1993). Feminist Legal Theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Weisberg K.(1993). Introduction. İçinde, Weisberg D.K. (Ed.), Feminist Legal Theory-Foundations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: xv-xx.
Young I.M. (1987). Impartiality and Civic Public. İçinde Benhabib Ş. & Cornell D. (Ed.), Feminism as Critique. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 57-76.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [6 months] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)