Feminist Uluslararası İlişkiler Yazını Üzerine Bir İnceleme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33831/jws.v20i2.79Anahtar Kelimeler:
feminist uluslararası ilişkiler- Ann Tickner- BMGK 1325Özet
Uluslararası İlişkiler disiplini ve feminizm, günümüzün önemi giderek artan bir tartışma alanıdır. 1980’li yılların ikinci yarısında, Uluslararası İlişkiler alanında realizmin tanımaldığı pek çok kavramın sorgulandığı bir dönemde, disiplinin toplumsal cinsiyet odaklı metinler üretmesi de önem kazanmıştır. Uluslararası İlişkiler disiplini maalesef ki hala eril bir alan olarak tartışılsa bile, feminist Uluslararası İlişkiler üzerine son otuz yılda pek çok önemli metin yazılmış ve realist paradigmayı sarsan pek çok tartışma yapılmıştır. Bu bağlamda alanda ciddi bir literatür oluştuğunu söylemek mümkündür. Bu çalışma, feminist Uluslararası İlişkiler yazınında ortaya konan belli başlı metinlerin ve tartıştıkları konuların dönemsel bir incelemesini yapmayı amaçlamaktır. Genel anlamda kronolojik olarak ilerleyecek olan çalışma, 1980’li yılların sonu, 1990 ve 2000’li yıllarda yazılan metinleri inceleyecektir. Alanda yazılmış bütün metinler inceleme iddiası olmayan çalışma, önemli yazarları ve uluslararası alanda ortaya konulmuş belli başlı metinleri bu konuda çalışmak isteyenlere yol göstermek için inceleyecektir.
Referanslar
Ackerly B.A. & True J. (2010). Doing Feminist Research in the Political and Social Sciences. New York: Palgrave. Bodur Ün M. (Ed.) (2017). Feminist Uluslarası İlişkiler. Alternatif Politika (Özel Sayısı), 9(3). İnternet adresi: http://alternatifpolitika.com/site/cilt/9/sayi/3/AP-9-3.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 1.4.2019.
Ataç C.A. (2009). Re-entering the Cosmopolitan Phase of Imperium: Remarks on Obama’s Presidency and Discussions of Empire. Perceptions, Journal of International Affairs, 14(1-2): 1-3.
Atmaca Ö.A. & Gözen Ercan P. (2018). Uluslararası Güvenliği Yeniden Düşünmek: Uluslararası Ilişkiler Disiplininde Feminist Eleştiriler. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 15(59): 19-31.
Aydın Koyuncu Ç. (2011). Dış Politika Karar Verme Mekanizmalarında Kadının Yeri. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 44(4): 99-120.
Aydın-Koyuncu Ç. (2012). Feminist Uluslararası İlişkiler Yaklaşımları Açısından Güvenlik Konusunun Analizi. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi, 57(1): 111-139.
Bilgiç, A. (2015). ‘We are not Barbarians.’ Gender politics and Turkey’s Quest for the West. International Relations, 29(2): 198-218.
Bilgiç A. (2016). Turkey, Power and the West: Gendered International Relations and Foreign Policy. London: I.B. Taurus.
Blanchard E.M. (2003). Gender, International Relations, and the Development of Feminist Security Theory. Signs, 28(4): 1289-1312.
Caprioli M. (2004). Feminist IR Theory and Quantitative Methodology. International Studies Review, 6(2): 253-269.
Carpenter R.C. (2002). Gender Theory in World Politics: Contributions of a Non-Feminist Standpoint? International Studies Review, 4(3): 153-165.
Carver T. (1996). Gender is Not a Synonym for Women. Colorado: L. Rienner.
Carver T. (1998). Gendering IR. Millennium, 27: 343-351.
Carver T., Cochran M. & Squires J. (1998). Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies, 24(2): 283-297.
Carver T. (Ed.) (2003). Gender and International Relations. The Forum. International Studies Review, 5: 287-302.
Donaldson M. (1993). What is Hegemonic Masculinity? Theory and Society, 22(5): 643-657.
Enloe C. (1990). Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Enloe C. (1993). The Morning After-Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. University of California Press.
Enloe C. (2000) Masculinity as Foreign Policy Issue. Foreign Policy in Focus, 5(36): 1-4.
Enloe C. (2004). ‘Gender’ is Not Enough: The Need for a Feminist Consciousness. International Affairs, 80(1): 95-97.
Enloe C (2017). The Big Push. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Franklin M.I. (2010). Sex, Gender and Cyberspace. İçinde, Shepard L.J. (Ed.), Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. Oxon: Routledge: 375-388.
Fukuyama F. (1998). Women and the Evolution of World Politics. Foreign Affairs, 77(5): 24-40.
Halliday F. (1988). Hidden from International Relations: Women and the International Arena. Millennium, 17(3): 419-428.
Harding S.G. (1986) The Science Question in Feminism. London: Cornell University Press.
Hawthrone S. & Klein R. (1999). Cyberfeminism: Connectivity, Critique, Creativity. Melbourne: Spinifex Pree Ply.
Hemmings C. (2012). Affective Solidarity: Feminist Reflexivity and Political Transformation. Feminist Theory, 13(2): 147-161.
Hooper C. (2001). Manly States: Masculinities, international Relations, and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hutching K. (2000). Towards a feminist International Ethics. Review of International Studies, 26(5): 111-130.
Hutchings K. (2004). From Morality to Politics and Back Again: Feminist International Ethics and the Civil Society Argument. Alternatives, 24(3): 239-244.
Jackson P.T. (2014). The ‘Third Debate’ 25 Years Later. International Studies Quarterly. İnternet adresi: https://www.isanet.org/Publications/ISQ/Posts/ID/297/The-Third-Debate-25-Years-Lat er. Erişim tarihi: 31 Temmuz 2018.
Jones A. (1996). Does Gender Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 22: 405-429.
Jones A. (1998). Engendering Debate. Review of International Studies, 24: 299-303.
Keohane R. (1989). International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint. Millennium, 18(2): 245-253.
Keohane R.O. (1998). Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations between International Relations and Feminism: A Reply to J. Ann Tickner. International Studies Quarterly, 42(1): 194-199.
Lapid Y. (1989). The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era. International Studies Quarterly, 33(3): 235-254.
Levi S. & Toupin S. (2010). New Social Media and Global Resistance. İçinde, Shepard L.J. (Ed.). Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations Oxon: Routledge: 389-401.
Lykke N. (2010). Feminist Studies: A Guide to intersectional Theory, Methodology and Writing. New York: Routledge.
Maruska He eg J. (2010). When are States Hypermasculine. İçinde, Sjoberg L. (Ed.), Gender and International Security. London: Routledge: 235-255.
Women and International Relations (1988). Millennium: Journal of International Studies (Special Issue), 17(3).
Özdemirkıran M. & Öner S. (2017). Türkiye’de Kadın Uluslararası İlişkiler Akademisyenlerinin Profili: Marmara Bölgesi. Fe Dergi, 9(1): 92-112.
Peterson V.S. (2004). Feminist Theories within, Invisible to, and Beyond IR. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2): 35-46.
Romaniuk S.N. & Wasylciw J.K. (2010). ‘Gender’ includes Men Too: Recognizing Masculinity in Security Studies and International Relations. Perspectives, 18(1): 23-39.
Shepherd L.J. (Ed.) (2010). Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. London and New York: Routledge.
Steans J. (1998). Gender and International Relations: An Introduction. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Steans J. (2006). Gender and International Relations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Steans J., Tepe-Belfrage D. (Eds.) (2016). Handbook on Gender in World Politics. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sylvester C. (1994). Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Cambridge University Press.
Sylvester C. (2002). Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey. Cambridge University Press.
Tickner J.A. (1988). Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformation. Millennium, 17(3): 429-440.
Tickner A.J. (1992). Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press.
Tickner J.A. (1994). Feminist Perspectives on Peace and World Security in the Post-Cold War Era. İçinde, Klare M.T. (Ed.), Peace & World Security Studies: A Curriculum Guide. Boulder, London: Lynne Rienner Publishers: 43–54.
Tickner J.A. (1997). You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4): 611-632.
Tickner J.A. (1999). Searching for the Princess? Feminist Perspectives in International Relations. Harvard International Review, 21(4): 44-48.
Tickner J.A. (1999). Why Women Can't Run the World: International Politics According to Francis Fukuyama. International Studies Review, 1(3): 3–11.
Tickner J.A. (2002). Feminist Perspectives on 9/11. International Studies Perspectives, 3(4): 333-350.
Tickner J.A. (2006). On the Frontlines or Sidelines of Knowledge and Power: Feminist Practices of Responsible Scholarship. International Studies Review, 8(3): 383-395.
Tickner A.J. (2008). Gender in World Politics. İçinde, Baylis J., Smith S. & Owens P. (Eds.), The Globalization of World Politics. Oxford University Press: 262-277.
Tickner A.J. & Sjoberg L. (Eds). (2011). Feminism and International Relations: Conversations about the Past, Present and Future. London: Routledge.
Togeby L. (1994). The Gender Gap in Foreign Policy Attitudes. Journal of Peace Research, 31: 375-92.
True J. (2017). Feminism and gender studies in International Relations theory. Oxford Research Encyclopedia: International Studies. Oxford University Press: 1-23. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/97801 90846626.013.46.
Tür Ö. & Aydın Koyuncu Ç. (2010). Feminist Uluslararası İlişkiler Yaklaşımı: Temelleri, Gelişimi, Katkı ve Sorunları. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 7(26): 3-24.
Weber C. (1994). Good Girls, Little Girls and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert
Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Relations, 23: 337-349.
Youngs G. (2004). Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender are Essential to Understanding the Eorld ‘We’ Live in. International Affairs, 80 (1): 75-87.
Yöney S. (1996). Uluslararası İlişkiler, Feminizm ve Türkiye. İçinde, Sönmezoğlu F. (Der.), Değişen Dünya ve Türkiye. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık: 103-121.
Zalewski M. (1993). Feminist Standpoint Theory Meets International Relations Theory. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 17(3): 13-32.
Zalewski M. & Enloe C. (1995). Questions about Identitiy in International Relations. İçinde, Booth K. & Simith S. (Eds.), International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press: 279-305.
Zalewski M. (2013). Feminist International Relations: Exquisite Corpse. London, New York: Routledge.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [6 months] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
