The Slaughterhouse from a Feminist Perspective: Violence, Labor, and the Backgrounding of Nature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33831/2x289834Keywords:
Slaughterhouse, Care Ethics, Backgrounding, Intersectionality, Absent ReferentAbstract
This study analyzes the slaughterhouse, one of the most closed-off spaces of the modern industrial system, as a regime of power in which violence, labor, and nature are institutionally rendered invisible. The main problem addressed is how the spatial and symbolic isolation of production processes in the slaughterhouse affects the generation of social indifference and ethical distancing. The theoretical framework of the study is built upon Val Plumwood’s concept of “backgrounding” (2017) and Carol J. Adams’s notion of the “absent referent” (2013).
Within the scope of the analysis, the analysis examines how the slaughterhouse's organizational structure keeps dependent bodies—animals, precarious workers, and ecological elements—at the center of material production while simultaneously marginalizing them on symbolic and ethical levels. Drawing on Timothy Pachirat’s (2011) conceptualization of “ethical distance,” the study examines how the act of killing is rendered routine through technical rationalization and an extreme division of labor. Furthermore, within the frameworks of Joan Tronto’s (1993) “privileged irresponsibility” and Lori Gruen’s (2015) “entangled empathy,” the article demonstrates how the slaughterhouse's technical order suspends the principles of care ethics and creates a space of emotional disconnection.
The main findings reveal that the slaughterhouse is not merely a food production facility but a biopolitical space where practices of exploitation intersect along the axes of class, gender, and species. In conclusion, the article defines the slaughterhouse as a structural model of denial in which dependent beings are both exploited and excluded from public recognition, emphasizing the methodological necessity for feminism to develop an intersectional analysis that transcends species boundaries.
References
Adams, C. J. (2013). Etin cinsel politikası: Feminist-vejetaryen eleştirel kuram (G. Tezcan & M. E. Boyacıoğlu, Çev.). İstanbul, Türkiye: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Adams, C. J., & Gruen, L. (Ed.)., (2014). Ecofeminism: Feminist intersections with other animals and the earth (2. bs.).
Arendt, H. (2009). Kötülüğün sıradanlığı: Adolf Eichmann Kudüs’te (Ö. Çelik, Çev.). İstanbul, Türkiye: Metis Yayınları. (Orijinal eser 1963 yılında yayımlandı).
Atrey, S. (2019). Intersectional discrimination. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Avrupa İmar ve Kalkınma Bankası (EBRD) & ILLAC Ltd. (t.y.). Şirketler için toplumsal cinsiyet temelli şiddet ve tacize karşı kurum politikası geliştirme rehberi. London, England: EBRD. 12 Mayıs 2026 tarihinde https://www.ebrd.com/downloads/about/sustainability/GBVH_Guidance_Private_Sector_Clients_Turkiye_Turkish.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
Berger, J. (2017). Hayvanlara niçin bakarız? (C. Soydemir, Çev.). İzmir, Türkiye: Delidolu Yayınları.
Blanchette, A. (2020). Porkopolis: American animality, standardized life, and the factory farm. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Butler, J. (2013). Cinsiyet belası: Feminizm ve kimliğin altüst edilmesi (B. Ertür, Çev.). İstanbul, Türkiye: Metis Yayınları. (Orijinal eser 1990’da yayımlanmıştır).
Collins, P. H. (2019). Intersectionality as critical social theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Cronon, W. (1991). Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
Çöp, S., Çakmak, M., & Köklü, O. (2021). Helal gıda sertifikalarına yönelik bir araştırma. Helal ve Etik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(2), 47–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.51973/head.956072
Davis, A. Y. (1983). Women, race & class. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Deckha, M. (2021). Animals as legal beings: Contesting anthropocentric legal orders. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Dunayer, J. (2001). Animal equality: Language and liberation. Derwood, MD: Ryce Publishing.
Dunayer, J. (2003). English and speciesism. English Today, 19(1), 61–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266078403001093
Fitzgerald, A. J. (2010). A social history of the slaughterhouse: From inception to contemporary implications. Human Ecology Review, 17(1). Erişim tarihi: 17 Mayıs 2026, https://w.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her171/Fitzgerald.pdf
Fitzgerald, A. J., Kalof, L., & Dietz, T. (2009). Slaughterhouses and increased crime rates: An empirical analysis of the spillover from “the jungle” into the surrounding community. Organization & Environment, 22(2), 158–184. doi:10.1177/1086026609338164
Fraser, N., & Jaeggi, R. (2018). Capitalism: A conversation in critical theory. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
Gaard, G. (Ed.)., (2005). Ecofeminism: Women, animals, nature. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı. (2018, 3 Mart). Küçük kapasiteli kesimhanelerin genel ve özel hijyen kurallarına dair yönetmelik. Resmî Gazete (Sayı: 30349). 14 Mayıs 2026 tarihinde https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/03/20180303-3.htm adresinden edinilmiştir.
Gillespie, K. (2018). The cow with ear tag #1389. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gilmore, R. W. (2007). Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gruen, L. (2015). Entangled empathy: An alternative ethic for our relationships with animals. New York, NY: Lantern Books.
Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Katz, J. (2006). The macho paradox: Why some men hurt women and how all men can help. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.
Lee, P. Y. (2005). Hide, seek, slaughter, meat: The slaughterhouse as site. Food & History, 3(2), 153–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1484/J.FOOD.2.301761
Lefebvre, H. (2014). Mekânın üretimi (I. Ergüden, Çev.). İstanbul, Türkiye: Sel Yayıncılık. (Orijinal eser 1974’te yayımlanmıştır).
Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital. London, England: Verso Books.
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6-18.
Narayanan, Y. (2025). Animal-state relations: A critical multispecies geopolitics of animality. Progress in Human Geography, 49(5), 508–527. doi:10.1177/03091325251348611. 5 Mayıs 2026 tarihinde journals.sagepub.com/home/phg adresinden edinilmiştir.
Pachirat, T. (2011). Every twelve seconds: Industrialized slaughter and the politics of sight. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Plumwood, V. (2004). Feminizm ve doğaya hükmetmek (B. Ertür, Çev.). İstanbul, Türkiye: Metis Yayınları. (Orijinal eser 1993’te yayımlanmıştır).
Price, C., & Chao, S. (2023). Multispecies, more-than-human, non-human, other-than-human: Reimagining idioms of animacy in an age of planetary unmaking. Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 10(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.31273/eirj.v10i2.1166
Sebastian, M. (2025). Professional emotional neutrality and the role of background emotion work in the slaughterhouse. Agriculture and Human Values, 42(4), 1707–1721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-025-10713-4
Segal, L. (1992). Ağır çekim: Değişen erkeklikler değişen erkekler (V. Ersoy, Çev.). İstanbul, Türkiye: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Shukin, N. (2009). Animal capital: Rendering life in biopolitical times. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Slade, J., & Alleyne, E. (2023). The psychological impact of slaughterhouse employment: A systematic literature review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(2), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211030243
T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. (1997). Kanatlı kesimhaneleri ve kesimhane personeli için hijyen yönetmeliği (GSO Standart No. 713/1997). Ankara, Türkiye: Gıda ve Kontrol Genel Müdürlüğü. 2 Mayıs 2026 tarihinde https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/GKGM/Belgeler/DB_Hayvan_Sinir/SuudiArabistan_Mevzuati/Kanatli_Kesimhaneleri_ve_Kesimhane_Personeli_icin_Hijyen_Yonetmeligi.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. (2025). Hayvan varlığı istatistikleri, 2024-2025 (İstatistik Bülteni, Sayı: 008). Ankara, Türkiye: Tarım Reformu Genel Müdürlüğü. 18 Mayıs 2026 tarihinde https://istatistik.tarimorman.gov.tr/Sayfa/Detay/2113 adresinden edinilmiştir.
T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. (2026). Hayvan varlığı istatistikleri, 2025 (İstatistik Bülteni, Sayı: 049). Ankara, Türkiye: Tarım Reformu Genel Müdürlüğü. 19 Mayıs 2026 tarihinde https://istatistik.tarimorman.gov.tr/Sayfa/Detay/2222 adresinden edinilmiştir.
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York, NY: Routledge.
Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2025). Hayvansal üretim istatistikleri, 2024 (Haber Bülteni, Sayı: 53935). Ankara, Türkiye. 22 Mayıs 2026 tarihinde https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/tr/press/53935 adresinden edinilmiştir.
Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2026). Hayvansal üretim istatistikleri, 2025 (Haber Bülteni, Sayı: 58015). Ankara, Türkiye. 25 Mayıs 2026 tarihinde https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/tr/press/58015 adresinden edinilmiştir.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kadın/Woman 2000, Journal for Women's Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [6 months] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
