“The End of Innocence” From an Ecofeminist Perspective: Outlying Islands and Ellen's Emancipation

Authors

  • Lebriz Sönmez Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33831/jws.v26i1.519

Keywords:

Ecofeminism, Dualism, Plumwood, Woman, Nature

Abstract

Patriarchal practices such as racism, class discrimination, marginalization, oppression, and objectification, along with the exploitation of nature and women, have become increasingly discussed and researched in recent years. In Western culture, nature and women have historically been conceptualized in a way that devalues everything associated with women, nature, emotions, animals, and the body, while elevating everything linked to men, reason, humans, culture, and logic. David Greig’s play Outlying Islands tells the story of two young scientists sent to a remote Scottish island in 1939, under the shadow of war, to study the island’s biodiversity, alongside the island’s caretaker uncle and a female character. The play provides a rich foundation for an ecofeminist analysis, addressing themes of scientific inquiry, human-nature relationships, female emancipation, and the patriarchal desire to control nature and women. Centered on the conflict between nature, humanity, and the modern world, the play positions the harsh climate and environmental conditions as pivotal elements in the narrative.
The portrayal of a remote island used as an experiment by the government highlights the ecofeminist critique of patriarchal ideologies that commodify nature through a disposable lens. In this study, the female character, who represents a more intuitive and embodied connection with nature compared to the male scientists, will be analyzed through an ecofeminist lens. Val Plumwood’s philosophy of dualism will serve as the primary framework for examining the opposing binaries in the play and decoding its ecofeminist message. From an interdisciplinary perspective, this study will analyze how patriarchal domination of women and nature manifests and its consequences within the fictional narrative set in a real geographical context. The aim of this research is to provide a conceptual and comprehensive understanding of ecofeminism while contributing to feminist and ecological literature through the analysis of a theatrical work.

References

Aydın Cansaran, A. (2023). Kadın Ve Doğa Bağlamında Ekolojik Bir Görüş: Ekofeminizm". Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi. 2 (1), 48-62.

Bahaffou, M. ve Gorecki, J. (2020). Le féminisme ou la mort Françoise d’Eaubonne Préface, Le Passager Clandestin: Paris.

Berktay, F. (1996). Ekofeminizm ya da yüreğinin iyimserliği. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, (4), 73-76.

Carlasser, E. (1999). Socialist and cultural ecofeminism: Allies in resistance. Ethics and the Environment, 5(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1085-6633

Chakraborty, R. (2015). The deep ecology/ecofeminism debate: An enquiry into environmental ethics. Journal of Indian Council of Philo-sophical Research, 32(1), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-015-0005-y

Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the Witch. Autonomedia, USA. ISBN: 1-57027-059-7.

Federici, E. (2022). Why ecofeminism matters, Narration/translatin ecofeminism(s). Iperstoria, Saggi/Essays, (20), 66-77.

Gaard, G. (2015). Ecofeminism and climate change. Women’s Studies International Forum. (49), 20-33. Elsevier.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2015.02.004

Gardner, L. (3.Ağustos.2002). Outlying Islands. The Guardian. Erişim tarihi: 02.09.2024, http://www.theguardian.com/stage/2002/aug/03/theatre.artsfeatures2

Greig, D. (2010). David Greig Selected Plays 1999-2009: Outlying Islands. Contemporary Classics, Faber and Faber. London. ss. 131-232. ISBN: 978-0-571-23415-8.

Grewe-Volpp, C. (2016). Ecofeminism, the toxic body, and Linda Hogan’s Power. H. Zapf (Ed.), Handbook of Ecocriticism and Cultural Ecology. (s. 208-225). De Gruyter.

Hovorka, A. J. (2006). The no. 1 Ladies’ poultry farm: A feminist political ecology of urban agriculture in Botswana. Gender, Place & Culture. 13(3), 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690600700956

Kandemir, I. Y. ve Kutlar, İ. (2024). Kırsal alanda doğanın korunmasında kadının rolü ve ekofeminizm. Kadın/Woman 2000. 25(1), 111-118.

Khalid, N. A. (2021). Cultural ecofeminism in Pat Mora’s poetry: The desert as “Curandera.” Al-Adab Journal. (136), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i136.1027

Milton, K. (1997). Ecologies: Anthropology, culture, and the environment. International Social Science Journal, 49(154), 477-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.1997.tb00039.x

Nicolás Román, S. (2010). Subverting Darwin: Female historicity in David Greig’s Outlying Islands (2002). SJANI Journal of Literary Theory and Comparative Literature, (11), 100-104.

Otto, E. C. (2014). Ecofeminist theories of liberation in the science fiction of Sally Miller Gearhart, Ursula K. Le Guin, and Joan Slonczewski. D. A. Vakoch (Ed.), Feminist Ecocriticism: Environment, Women, and Literature (ss. 65-84). Lexington Books.

Özdemir, H. ve Aydemir, D. (2019). Ekolojik yaklaşımlı feminizm/ekofeminizm üzerine genel bir değerlendirme: Kavramsal analizi, tarihi süreci ve türleri. Akdeniz Kadın Çalışmaları ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Dergisi. II(2), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.33708.ktc.608639

Özyol, A. İ. (2013). Sürdürülebilir yeşil kalkınma ve kadın. Fe Dergi. 5(2), 134-138. Erişim tarihi: 2.09.2024, http://cins.ankara.edu.tr/10_15.html

Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, Feminism For Today. London and New York: Routledge.

Shiva, V. (1988). Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. Zed Books.

Steiner, F. (2016). How nature and culture shape our world: Human ecology. Island Press.

Stevens, N. E. (2015). What Steward got right: Technology, work organization, and cultural evolution. N. Goodale & W. Andrefsky Jr. (Eds.), Lithic Technological Systems and Evolutionary Theory (ss. 253-266). Cambridge University Press.

Steward, J. H. (1955). Theory of culture change: The methodology of multilinear evolution. University of Illinois Press.

Sullivan, M. M. (2014). Shifting subjects and marginal worlds: Revealing the radical in Rachel Carson’s three sea books. D. A. Vakoch (Ed.), Feminist Ecocriticism: Environment, Women, and Literature (ss. 85-96). Lexington Books.

Tamkoç, G. (1996). Ekofeminizmin amaçları. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, (4), 77-84.

Topgül, S. (2012). Kadın ve doğa ilişkisi: Ekofeminizm. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 27, 71-83.

Viel, A. (2003). Pour une écologie culturelle. Culture & Musées, 1(1), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.3406/pumus.2003.1171

Warren, K. J. (2000). Ecofeminist philosophy: A western perspective on what it is and why it matters. Rowman&Littlefield Publishers.

Zapf, H. (2016). Literature as cultural ecology: Sustainable texts. Bloomsbury. Erişim tarihi: 11.12.2024, https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/58794

Published

2025-06-28

How to Cite

“The End of Innocence” From an Ecofeminist Perspective: Outlying Islands and Ellen’s Emancipation. (2025). Kadın/Woman/2000,/Journal/for/Women’s/Studies, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.33831/jws.v26i1.519