Feminisation of Rural Work and Young Women’s Dis/empowerment: A Case Study of Mountain Villages in the Western Black Sea Region of Turkey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33831/jws.v18i1.260Keywords:
feminisation of labour, rural transformation, rural women, women’s employment, feminisation of agriculture, intra-household bargainingAbstract
In this paper, we examine the process of feminisation of rural work in a case study of women’s employment at a seafood-processing factory in Western Black Sea Turkey. We explore the significance of women’s nonfarm employment to their household economy and how intra-household relations are affected when women participate in paid work. In order to understand the household characteristics and dynamics in relation to the work status of female household members, mixed methods were used for data collection – semi-structured interviews with 218 women and in-depth interviews with 27 women. The data indicate the significance of women’s paid work to rural household economy and also how the paid work has transformed the father-daughter relationship in particular. Recent rural transformation in the context of neoliberal agricultural policy, agricultural decline, and out-migration increased women’s workload. Today, rural household heavily depends on unmarried daughter’s labour regardless of her work status. Daughter’s participation in paid work however makes her labour visible and considerably undermines the authority of father who had already lost control over son’s labour. Yet we contend that daughter’s labour may be liberated from a traditional form of patriarchy; her participation into labour market results in an integration into not only market economy but also a modern form of patriarchy.
References
Berik G. (1995). Towards an Understanding of Gender Hierarchy in Turkey: A Comparative Analysis of Carpet-Weaving Villages. In Tekeli S. (Ed.), Women in Modern Turkish Society: A Reader. London and New Jersey: Zed Books: 112-128.
Boserup E. (1970). Woman’s Role in Economic Development. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Erman T.; Kalaycioğlu S. & Rittersberger-Tılıç H. (2002). Money-Earning Activities and Empowerment Experience of Rural Migrant Women in the City: The Case of Turkey. Women’s Studies International Forum, 25(4):395-410.
Ertürk Y. (1995). Rural Women and Modernization in South-eastern Anatolia. In Tekeli S. (Ed.), Women in Modern Turkish Society: A Reader. London and New Jersey: Zed Books: 141-152.
Gündüz-Hoşgör A. (2011). Kalkınma ve Kırsal Kadının Değişen Toplumsal Konumu: Türkiye Deneyimi Üzerinden Karadeniz Bölgesindeki İki Vaka’nın Analizi. In Sancar S. (Ed.), Bir Kaç Arpa Boyu: 21. Yüzyıla Girerken Türkiye’de Feminist Çalışmalar. Istanbul: Koç University Press: 219-247.
Gündüz-Hoşgör A. & M. Him S. (2016). Küreselleşme ve Türkiye'de Kırsal Kadının Ücretli Emeği: Rapana Venosa Üretim Zinciri Üzerinden Batı Karadeniz Bölgesinde Bir Vaka Analizi. Sosyoloji Araştırmalar Dergisi. 19(2):108-130.
Hürriyet (6.2.2016). 8 Kentin Nüfusu İstanbul’daki Hemşehrilerinin Gerisinde Kaldı. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/8-kentin-nufusu-istanbuldaki-hemsehrilerinin-gerisinde-kaldi-40050443 on 28.03.2016.
Kabeer N. (1997). Women, Wages and Intra-household Power Relations in Urban Bangladesh. Development and Change, 28: 261-302.
Kandiyoti D. (1988). Bargaining with Patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2(3): 274-90.
Keser E.M. (2013). Dikmen İlçe Analizi. T.C. Kuzey Anadolu Kalkınma Ajansı. Retrieved from http://kuzka.gov.tr/Icerik/Dosya/www.kuzka.gov.tr_1 8_EL6F73BR_dikmen_ilce_analizi.pdf on 19.07.2013.
Keyder Ç. (2013). 2000’lerde Devlet ve Tarım. In Keyder Ç. & Yenal Z. (Eds.), Bildiğimiz Tarımın Sonu: Küresel İktidar ve Köylülük. Istanbul: İletişm Yayıncılık: 191-218.
Kıray M.B. (1964). Ereğli: Ağrı Sanayiden Önce Bir Sahil Kasabası. Ankara: T.C. Başbakalık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı.
Lastarria-Cornhiel S. (2006). Feminization of Agriculture: Trends and Driving Forces. Background Paper for the World Development Report 2008. Retrieved from https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/109 19/68838/459_Lastarria_Cornhiel2006_Feminization_of_A.pdf?sequence=1 on 24.11 .2016.
Morvardi B. (1992). Gender Relations in Agriculture: Women in Turkey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40(3): 567-586.
Morvardi B. (1993). Gender and Household Management in Agriculture: Cash Crops in Kars. In Sterling P. (Ed.), Culture and Economy: Changes in Turkish Villages. Cambridgeshire: The Eothen Press: 81-94.
Özbay F. (1985). Transformation of the Socio-economic Structure and Changing Family Functions in Rural Turkey. In Erdar T. (Ed.), Family in Turkish Society: Sociological and Legal Studies. Ankara: Turkish Social Science Association: 43-77.
Özbay F. (1995). Changes in Women’s Activities both Inside and Outside the Home. In Tekeli S. (Ed.), Women in Modern Turkish Society: A Reader. London and New Jersey: Zed Books: 89-111.
Sterling P. (1965). Turkish Village. New York: John Wiley&Sons, INC.
Tekeli I. (2011). Türkiye Tarımnda Mekanizmasyonun Yarattığı Yapısal Dönüşümler ve Kırdan Kopuş Süreci. In Tekeli I. (Ed.) Göç ve Ötesi. İstanbul: Tarih Vakıf Yayınları: 68-95.
TurkStat (Turkish Statistical Institute) (2014). Press Release 2014/16. Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/basinOdasi/haberler/2014_16_201 40320.pdf on 01.05.2014.
Üçeçam Karagel D. (2010). Türkiye Kırsalında Tarımda Çalışan Kadın Nüfus (1990–2000). Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(13): 254-267.
WB (World Bank) (2007). World Bank Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. Washington: The World Bank Press.
Yasa I. (1969). Yirmibeş Yıl Sonra Hasanoğlan Köyü: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Toplum Bilimsel Araştırma. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [6 months] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)